The
month of February has showcased a host of protests by people as far and wide as
Venezuela , Thailand , Greece ,
Ukraine
and more. We saw countless Greek protests in the past, all of which failed to
achieve any real change. At times, we couldn’t help asking ourselves, “is this
it? Are we witnessing a chain reaction of change with which our generation
could have never imagined?” No, we didn’t witness that change. Why did these
protests fail to ignite changes sought by their followers? This can be answered
by one word, “Force”.
All of
these protests start and end in the same way. People get frustrated, they take
to the streets. The police contain them and the protest gets media time. Then
the police disperse them with water cannon, tear gas, rubber bullets and
batons. What is achieved? Nothing.
These
protests are indicative of the days we live in. Activists want something done,
they go to streets and speak their mind, and then they are driven away through
the use of violence controlled by the state. But what happens when a large group
of citizens stand their ground against the charge of police. This is where the
people of Ukraine
come in.
The
country of Ukraine
is a very divided country. West of Kiev, the people are very pro-European Union
whereas east and south the people lean towards Russia . The protests were big but
most of the days on Maidan square were quite small. This ranged from fifteen to
twenty-thousand people on the weekends and two to four thousand on the
weekdays. On top of the fifty-fifty divide in the country, it is safe to say
that an even smaller percentage wanted to see both the 2004 constitution and a
resignation letter from president Yanukovich.
These
goals were achieved despite their lack of popularity. If not a resignation
letter, the president has lost any power with which to exert over the country. This
was done because the states use of force backfired. The protesters wanted
something, and the state wanted them to go away. But when the police tried to
use violence, they were met with violence. By now the familiar image of police
catching fire with Molotov cocktails and being pelted with rocks is as vivid an
image as ever. But this wasn’t just a few isolated instances of violence, even
when the police tried using armored cars, the protesters forced them back. How?
They did this by meeting one person’s use of force with force of their own. Finally
the police were pulled back and the president evacuated the city.
What do
we have to learn from this? The state is not the only being with the right use
violence. Violence is an awful tool. It makes people suffer unwantedly. But the
state is willing to use it to maintain its role as a governing force in our
lives. We all have a right to do whatever we wish. We can be influenced by
others, however nothing can stop you except a simple decision between “Yes” and
“No”. What tyrants in history show us is that might makes right in this world. But
what Ukraine
shows us is that the state can do whatever, whenever it wants and it will back
up its words with violence.
The
question then becomes, are people willing to defend their ideas with the same
methods the state uses to enforce its? Ukraine is in a chaotic phase
because what the protesters didn’t lack in fortitude, they lacked in thinking
ahead. There will probably be a default the national debt, there could be a
civil war and Ukraine
could be balkanized in some time. But these protesters achieved something
unheard of, a big change. Now other Ukrainians will be tested. Will they be
able to defend their ideas in the same manner as the Kiev protesters will enforce theirs? In the
end, individual thinkers able to make the “Yes” or “No” decision will determine
if and when change comes to their countries.
No hay comentarios :
Publicar un comentario